
Minutes of the 1st meeting of the board of the Nordic Graduate
School of Language Technology (NGSLT)
- Version as of:
- 16 Jun 2004
- Time:
- 26 May 2004, at 9:25 - 16:00
- Place:
- Seminar room 331, Department of General Linguistics,
Siltavuorenpenger 20, University of Helsinki
- Participants:
- Pavel Skrelin, Nina Volskaya, Eirikur Rögnvaldsson, Inguna
Skadina, Robin Cooper (chair), Ruta Marcinkeviciene, Mare
Koit, Kimmo Koskenniemi, Torbjoern Svendsen, Daniel Hardt

- See a list on a separate
page.
- 1. Formalia
- Prof. Robin Cooper opened the meeting and was elected
chairman and Hanna Westerlund secretary of the meeting. The
minutes will be checked by passing it electronically to the
board members for possible comments and corrections and
accepted when the participants have no more suggestions for
revisions. The agenda which was distributed in advance, was
accepted as the agenda of the meeting (with minor
additions).
- 2. Presentation of the participating countries
- Each country had supplied in advance a summary of language
technology PhD education, master's level education and
research in the country, see the list of participants. In the
following are some observations relevant for the NGSLT task of
building cooperation and common infrastructure for the PhD
education in language technology (hereafter LT).
- Sweden: A large national graduate school with annual
recruiting of PhD students. The PhD education in Sweden
includes more course credits than most other countries. No
research programs dedicated to the LT. Research programmes
cover large and general concepts and include LT
indirectly.
- Finland: A small national graduate
school which enrolled 6 paid students for 2002-2005 (but
nothing secured after that).
- NW Russia: The arrangements differ
from the other European countries at present (two doctoral
degrees) but in the near future these diffenrences will be
eliminated as Russia has adopted the Bologna declaration.
- Denmark: Some further Danish universities could be
added to the preliminary list of graduate education with
relevance to LT. Some differences in the structure and
contents of the PhD training as compared to e.g. Sweden.
- Norway: PhD education follows the
3+2+3 year structure (except for engineering it is 5+3). No
national PhD programme, but LT students included in various
programmes. Total of some 25 full time PhD students (with
salary).
- Iceland: LT teaching in Iceland
started in 2002, no PhD training programmes.
- Estonia: No PhD programmes in LT but
in Tartu some 3 linguists PhD students study additional
mathematics and computater science, and some 3 PhD students of
computer science take additional courses in linguistics. No
governmental research programmes for LT but some small
projects receive funding from governmental organisations.
- Latvia: LT is not offered as a major
in the University of Latvia, but some master's theses of
other disciplines are related to LT.
- Lithuania: LT not offered as a major
in Lithuania. Computer science and philology (linguistics)
has the right to offer such and at PhD level, but these rights
have to be renewed perioidically which makes long term plannig
difficult.
- It was decided that each country revises, as needed,
the summary which then can be made available through the NGSLT
web site. Also a summary (of the number of full-time PhD
students among other things) would be valuable. The location
of LT within the domains seems to vary a lot in the
participating countries. Revised versions are to be sent to
prof. Koskenniemi wihin two weeks. Html or plain text
preferable formats, power point no problem but it will be
converted to pdf before they appear on the NGSLT website.
- 3. Presentation of the NGSLT website
- Robin Cooper showed the recently established website http://www.ngslt.org
- 4. Information about the Nordic General Seminar
- Robin Cooper and Kimmo Koskenniemi will give a presentation
of the NGSLT at the Nordic
General Seminar in June 17-18 in Copenhagen.
- 5. Budget
- The budget of NGSL comprising of ca. 1 million NOK (which
has been revised according to discussions with NorFA) was
presented. The board agreed that this is the basis for NGSLT
operations (with possible modifications which turn out to be
motivated).
- According to the principles of NorFA, local teachers are
expected to contribute the teaching as part of their normal
duties. International guest lecturers will be paid honoraries
and daily allowances according to normal practices.
Travelling and accommodation costs for all teachers and NGSLT
students are included in and will be covered by the
budget.
- 6. Mailing lists
- A mailing list for the board of the NGSLT will be
established, and another larger list for distributing
information about forthcoming courses for all potential PhD
students will be compiled based on existing preliminary
ones for GENST-NET.
- 7. Courses planned for 2004 (and later)
- The first course (NLP1) was already delivered in the spring
(although the participants were not yet formally registered to
NGSLT).
- Speech technology level 1 course shared by the NGSLT and the
Swedish GSLT to be delivered annually.
- Linguistics resources level 2 course planned to be given in
Autumn. The plan will be still elaborated by Daniel
Hardt.
-
Soft computing and data oriented methods, level 2
course to be delivered in Helsinki, December 2004 as an
intesive course.
- The board adopted the above courses as the curriculum of the
NGSLT.
- 8. Registration of doctoral students for courses and for the
school
- Presently no students have been formally registered as
students of the NGSLT. The board decided that there will be a
formal registration using a form to be filled and signed by
the applicant and his/her supervisor. Suprevisors are
expected to contribute to the NGSLT in resonable ways. A
draft was discussed and an improved version was agreed to be
distributed to the board for final acceptance.
- 9. Examination of courses and crediting procedure
- The official crediting will be made at each student's home
university based on the credits awarded by the courses. A
common understanding was that at least ECT credit equivalents
should be included in the credits given by courses.
- 10. Reimbursement of students/teachers
- The board discussed the procedures and principles of
refunding the travel and accommodation costs of NGSLT students
attending NGSLT activities. Following principles were agreed
upon:
- Whenever the home department of the NGSLT student can
first refund the cost to the student and then invoice
the University of Helsinki, that procedure ought to be
followed, because it simplifies the accounting and
administration. Issuing a single invoice for several NGSLT
travels further simplifies the administration.
- When the above procedure is not feasible, the student
must fill and send the appropriate form for travelling
expenses to the University of Helsinki accompanied with
all original receipts and tickets. The form must be sent
without any delay, so that it can be processed in Helsinki
no later than within 2 months of the travel.
- No daily allowances will be paid (or refunded) by the
NGSLT for the students.
- In order to be reimbursed, the NGSLT student is expected
to complete the course (not necessarily pass the course).
A student failing to complete a course (without an
acceptable reason) may be refused to enter further NGSLT
courses.
- The board also discussed the criteria for accepting
students to NGSLT courses. It was understood that in addition
to PhD students having an official status with a supervisor,
the NGSLT should also accept and refund research oriented
Master's level students who have a supervisor to recommend
them. This principle is necessary because in several of the
participating countries, there is no PhD programme for
language technology, and not even a formal discipline under
that name.
- The board also discussed whether researchers who have
already completed a PhD degree would be eligible to the NGSLT
courses. It was understood that they may apply and be
accepted but not refunded for their expenses.
- 11. Planned internal conference/end of year workshop
- It was decided that the planned final year internal
conference in Iceland was not really feasible because of
budgetary condiserations. Instead NGSLT would try to
coordinate final sessions of the courses in the autumn with
such an event so that students attending those final session
would already be present at the location of the final seminar.
A plan of inviting NorFA project participants to present their
projects to the school at this event. Robin and Kimmo should
discuss this possibility with Henrik Holmboe.
- 12. Election of student representatives to the board
- The application to NorFA for the NGSLT states that the board
of the graduate school ought to have two student members. As
it is the task of NGSLT students to elect their
representatives, the board has to wait until NGSLT formally
recruits students. Possibly the election could take place in
conjunction with a general meeting of the students held in
conjunction with the final year meeting discussed under point
11.
- 13. A proposal to establish a Nordic Journal of Language
Technology
- There has been some previous discussion about a possible new
journal, Nordic Journal of Language Technology (NJLT)
which would be published mainly in electronic form according
to Open Access Publishing principles. The board noted that
there less need for such a journal in speech technology than
in the rest of LT as there are plenty of established journals
in speech.
- The board understood that if such a journal could be
established, it should be of high quality and be properly
refereed. While such a journal could be closely connected to
NGSLT it should be run by an independent editor in chief,
editorial board and referees, even if NGSLT supervisors might
be expected to volunteer as referees and editors.
- In order to be realised, NJLT would need funding and some
kind of a project. Koskenniemi will try to raise some funding,
possibly by getting permissions to use some NorFA grants for
that purpose, and any other possible sources.
- 14. Remote decision making procedures by the board
- It was agreed that the board may meet via electronic mail
and make decisions by distributing the proposed decision, and
either (a) everybody replying and not objecting, or (b) none
of those who reply, objects, and the remaining ones do not
react within 14 days.
- The board discussed the use of videoconferencing techniques
which would be extremely useful in several areas of the NGSLT.
The board should return to the advancement of such techniques
in near future.
- 15. Date for next meeting
- The next meeting will be arranged in conjunction with the
seminar discussed under point 11. In addition, the board may
have electronic meetings as necessary.
- 16. Any other business
- The board briefly discussed the plan (included in the
proposal for NGSLT to NorFA) that there should an advisory
board consisting of three distinguished members of industry
for Nordic countries and members of the board were encouraged
to think of suggestions for suitable people.
- Members of the board were also advised that additional
funding relevant to NGSLT might be available from NorFA and
members were encouraged to look at NorFA's webpages for
up-to-date information.